NEW YORK TIMES
FUTURES IMPERFECT
By DWIGHT R. SANDERS and SCOTT H. IRWIN
Published: July 20, 2008
Full article DWIGHT R. SANDERS and SCOTT H. IRWIN New York Times
Excerpts:
...First, recent price increases do not neatly fit a bubble explanation. For example, livestock and meat futures markets did not experience price increases until recently, yet the concentration of speculative buying has been among the highest in these markets for some time. It is difficult to see why speculative buying would have an impact on some markets and not on others.
Second, there are very high prices for commodities without futures markets, like edible beans, and in futures markets that are not included in popular commodity index funds, like rice.
Third, commodity inventories should build when a bubble is present, when in fact inventories for most commodities have remained stable or fallen sharply over the last two years.
Over all, there is limited evidence that anything other than economic fundamentals is driving the recent run-up in commodity prices. The main driving factors in the energy markets include strong demand from China, India and other developing nations, a lack of growth in crude oil production and United States monetary policy. In the grain markets, driving factors are, in addition to monetary policy and demand from developing nations, the diversion of row crops to biofuel production and unfavorable weather that has hurt harvests"...
Last But Not Leased
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Full article INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Excerpts:
Energy Policy: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pushing the "Drill Responsibly in Leased Lands Act" to block offshore drilling. The fact is, these offshore rigs may be the ticket to saving both our coasts and our economy.
The act would deny oil companies any new leases unless they can show that they're diligently exploring and drilling in existing holdings. It's designed to con the public into thinking the Democrats actually support drilling and the oil companies are restricting supply to drive up prices and profits.
Democrats keep talking about "use it or lose it," referring to 68 million acres of existing leases. But these leases are being used and are already of limited duration. A lease is merely a permission slip to look for oil, not a guarantee of finding any.
THE AMERICAN
Don’t Blame the Speculators
By John L. Chapman Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Filed under: Economic Policy
Full article John L. Chapman The American
Excerpts:
Increased speculation in oil futures is not a cause of rising oil prices, but rather an effect of those prices.
In recent weeks, many U.S. lawmakers have blamed soaring oil prices on the “speculators” who have invested in energy futures markets. But can a small number of investors really harm an economy as big as ours? More specifically, do flows of investment capital cause market fundamentals to change, or are they more often the result of perceived changes in those fundamentals?
Throughout the Western world, politicians have a long history of railing against capital markets. For example, after George Soros made $1 billion in 1992 by shorting the British pound, British government officials blamed currency speculators for causing the UK’s economic problems. Similarly, at the end of the great German hyperinflation in 1923, prices stood at 1.38 trillion times their 1914 levels and unemployment approached 30 percent. But Reichsbank president Hjalmar Schacht railed against speculators who had shorted the Reichsmark against the dollar.
Today, in response to voter anger over high gasoline prices, committees in both the U.S. House and Senate are holding hearings on commodity speculation. Oil market speculation has “become a growth industry, and it is time for the government to intervene,” Michigan Democrat John Dingell, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said recently. “We need to consider a full range of options to counter this rapacious speculation.”
USA TODAY
Rick Jervis, William M. Welch and Richard Wolf
Worth the risk? Debate on offshore drilling heats up
July 14, 2008
Full article Rick Jervis, William M. Welch and Richard Wolf USA TODAY
Excerpts:
..."The big discoveries are happening offshore," says Robert Bryce, managing editor of Energy Tribune. "This is where the action is."
By most estimates, at least 18 billion barrels of oil can be produced from areas that are off-limits, on top of 68 billion barrels in areas where drilling is allowed. The 18 billion barrels would be enough to fuel the country for 2˝ years.
Randall Luthi, director of the Minerals Management Service, says the estimate is "extremely conservative, because it's been 20 or 30 years since we've had the opportunity to look and see what's there."...
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
July 1, 2008Forcing Oil Companies to Subsidize the Competition
By Deroy Murdock
June 30, 2008Full article Deroy Murdoch Real Clear Politics
Excerpts:
Rather than do something productive to increase fuel supplies, Congress wastes time hunting bogeymen and fabricating distractions. Lately they have excoriated Big Oil for the cardinal sin of "under-investing" in alternative energy.
ExxonMobil "only spent $10 million on renewables last year," House Energy Independence Committee Chairman Ed Markey (D., Mass.), moaned June 22 on ABC's This Week.
"I am very angry, frankly, at the oil companies," presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain (R., Ariz.) said June 12. "Not only because of the obscene profits they've made, but their failure to invest in alternative energy to help us eliminate our dependence on foreign oil."
June 25, 2008Big Oil isn't the big problem
Government efforts to go after the producers won't get us anywhere.
By Jacob Heilbrunn
June 24, 2008
Full article Jacob Heilbrunn Los Angeles Times
Excerpts:
Here we go again. Soaring oil prices have sent Washington politicians into overdrive to come up with a variety of legislative plans that aim to lower the cost of energy by targeting oil companies. Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, for example, has declared: "I'll make oil companies like Exxon pay a tax on their windfall profits, and we'll use the money to help families pay for their skyrocketing energy costs and other bills." It may sound good in theory, but if history is any guide, this is a pipe dream. The real danger isn't that Congress will do too little, but too much.
The recent past suggests that, in fact, efforts to influence the supply of energy can actually boomerang, driving up prices and consumption. Rather than demonize Big Oil, lawmakers should focus on tamping down demand.
Washington's record when it comes to forcing oil prices down by trying to manipulate the supply of energy is dismal. In August 1971, the Nixon administration, mired in an expensive war in Vietnam, worried about the state of the dollar and fearful of rising inflation, introduced wage and price controls for a period of 90 days, which turned into several years. President Nixon scrapped most of the controls in 1974 (they weren't working generally), but because government needed some sort of response to increased oil prices, he kept the provisions relating to energy. Under the scheme, there were limits on the price and therefore the profits on oil produced domestically. At the same time, however, there were no such limits on imported oil. Oil companies could make more money importing oil than producing it at home.
June 6, 2008REAL CLEAR POLITICS More Oil Drilling, Please
By Deroy Murdock
Full article Deroy Murdock RCP
Excerpts:
How much more pain must Americans endure before our masters in Washington let oil companies punch a few holes in the Alaskan tundra? Must we shiver pennilessly in the dark before we may extract new domestic petroleum deposits? Or shall we simply keep buying $114 barrels of oil from people who want us dead?
In case Congress missed the news, four U.S. airlines have gone broke during this month alone. Frontier declared bankruptcy, but will continue flying. Even worse, Aloha, ATA, and Skybus blamed unaffordable fuel as they grounded their jets. Aloha said sayonara to 1,900 employees, NBC News reports. ATA's demise destroyed 2,200 jobs, while Skybus sacked 450 workers, atop the 80,000 positions lost across the economy as unemployment spiked from 4.8 percent in February to 5.1 in March.
Losing these airlines likely will boost plane-ticket prices, which already have climbed alongside fuel bills. Since April 11, 2007, a gallon of jet fuel has risen 69.3 percent to $3.44. The International Air Transport Association calculates that jet fuel will cost airlines worldwide an extra $58 billion in 2008 versus 2007. Having ditched complimentary meals, movies, and even pillows on many flights, there is little left for embattled carriers to curtail, as their chief expense goes sky high. What's next? Bring your own seat belt.
Year 1973
Introduced: Project Independence.
President: Richard Nixon
Forecast for Energy Independence: 1980.

File your taxes online with CompleteTax today. No hidden state fees.
PC Magazine ..."it's a solid online 1040 product at a good price."
PC Magazine
Year 1975
Introduced: Energy Policy and Conservation Act, setting federal standards for energy efficiency in cars.
President: Gerald Ford
Year Forecast for Energy Independence: 1985
Year 1977
Created: U.S. Department of Energy
President: Jimmy Carter
Year Forecast for Energy Independence: 1990
Year 1991
Announced: A National Energy Strategy To Reduce Our Dependence on Foreign Oil.
President: George H. W. Bush
Year Forecast for Energy Independence: None
Year 1992
President: Bill Clinton
Proposed: A tax of 59.9 cents per million BTU on crude oil to discourage Dependence on Foreign oil.
Year 1993
Formed: A partnership for New Generation Vehicles with the Big 3 Auto Makers To Produce Highly Fuel Efficient Cars by 2004.
Year 2001
President: George W. Bush
Formed: VP Cheney's National Energy Task Force.
Year 2003
President: George W.Bush
Pledged: "To promote energy independence for our country”.