Liberal Agenda: Jealousy Towards Better Competitors
Looks To GOVT To Even Things out

Most liberals do not compete well, in life. As a result, they turn to government to force outcomes for their personal agenda.

Forced Outcomes, through government, have had an enormously destructive effect on America.

HOW HAS THIS HAPPENED

The Liberal movement has a stranglehold on the national microphone. Exposure to that microphone, begins with early childhood. That microphone consists of:

1. The Nanny-State Media2. The Public-School-Monopoly3. University Professors4. Democrat Politicians

Almost 100% of those above will create zero wealth for their entire lives. This will not stop them from condemning those who took the risk, to provide their very good living and opportunity, for a lifetime. Vilifying business and profits, especially the rewards of risk and achievement, has been the mantra of the Liberal movement since FDR.

CLASS WARFARE, escalated greatly after LBJ, then turned deadly, upon hearing Ronald Reagan utter the words, "Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem."

Those 4 groups with that powerful microphone, consist of very few, who have ever taken a serious risk in creating wealth, which is so crucial to opportunity. They have spent a lifetime reading books, writing and talking, but experiencing little, in the vital areas of wealth creation, opportunity or making and keeping the nation strong and safe, all so vital to the freedom we enjoy.

Yet, non-stop, they appear on TV every day, confidently telling the public how and what needs to be done to remake America into their utopia.

Nor have more than a handful served their country on active duty in the military, in anything more than paltry numbers, if that. Even in tough physical team sports, Americans love and greatly respect, such as football, not more than a few, who have the most to say, would have any background as tough competitors.

If any entity would raise doubts about this, we certainly could ask the Washington Press Corp, or the other 3 groups, to send data to refute this. Opportunity in America has been the envy of the world, for about 150 years. Our living standard, our national strength and freedom, technological advances and all major areas of our existence have come largely from risk/reward/competition.

THE FREEDOM TO COMPETE

The freedom to compete has advanced America greatly, both within and internationally.

Conversely, restricting competition, has contributed greatly to centuries old dictatorships, tyranny, illiteracy and poverty.

Since Liberals resent America's system of REWARD BASED ON ACHIEVEMENT, they vote unceasingly for redistribution by GOVERNMENT. They elect and reelect, politicians who reward them and their selected victim groups. The expropriation of the daily labor, of those who persist at work, gets used for social engineering, resulting in massive entitlement programs. Famed British playwright (Pygmalion/My Fair Lady) George Bernard Shaw, said it best:

"Whenever you rob Peter To Pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul."

Lifetime Democrat, Zell Miller, left the U.S. Senate in disgust in 2004.

In his book, A NATIONAL PARTY NO MORE, Sen. Miller, referring to fellow Democrats in the U.S. Senate, stated "They also believe in purity.

Like that old Ivory Soap commercial, 99.44/100 percent pure is all that will do. You cannot agree on just seven of their ten issues, or even nine. All ten must be embraced and ostentatiously hugged to your bosom with slobbering kisses."

The Microphone

1. JOURNALISTS-THE NANNY-STATE MEDIA

A huge majority in the Mainstream Media are liberals. They are registered Democrats in large numbers, They consistently vote, 80% or more for Democrats. They contribute to Democrat politicians, by a similar margin.

EXAMPLE: MSNBC.com identified 143 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 16 gave to Republicans. That's a ratio of 8 to 1.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113485/

In 1992, Bill Clinton received 92% of the vote of the Washington D.C. Press Corp, George H. W. Bush received 7%. This trend has existed for decades, with little if any, change.

2. The Public-School-Monopoly

Any believer in traditional American values, would likely be horrified by reading the platform of the National Education Association (NEA). Much of that agenda has a basis in forced outcomes, while virtually ignoring traditional values.

The Public-School-Monopoly is and has been brainwashing young minds as scandalously and dangerously as recent dictatorships, getting and setting young minds in one direction. A certain percentage of young minds, will remain brainwashed for a lifetime.

3. University and College Professors--Are They Economic Illiterates?

Most professors in our universities have no experience in wealth creation. Frequently they are referred to as Egghead Professors. Most of their learning and life's experiences have come from books. Never having met a payroll or created 1 job, liberal profs fill the heads-almost unanimously-of young inexperienced minds just several years removed from adolescence, with nanny-state, special interest, victim-laden nonsense, learned from books.

Winston Churchill's quote Is Worth Reflection:

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

THE UNCEASING ADVANCEMENT OF THE NANNY-STATE

4. Politicians

This category is the most powerful and damaging of all. No congress, controlled by Democrats in the last 45 years has voted to hold or spend less than any President, from their own party or the Republican Party.

Republicans, acted responsibly, under the Contract With America, when they forced President Clinton to sign a 7 year Balanced Budget Amendment. Instead of taking 7 years, it took only 4 years to turn deficits into surpluses.

From 2000 to 2006, the Republican congress, acted irresponsibly, as its members spent money as if they were Democrats. Democrats as always, fought for even more spending.

This President and Democrat Congress are going wildly in the opposite direction of responsible spending, plunging us into enormous debt and expanding both the nanny-state and government power to unimaginable levels.

Class warfare against competition and reward is inherently damaging and evil, it could actually bring down this greatest of all nations. We must act quickly and decisively against such tyranny.

AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE

Why We're Happy

By Arthur C. Brooks

Monday, June 16, 2008

Reader's Digest (July 2008) Publication Date: June 16, 2008

Excerpts:

You want to be happy. I'm going to make this assumption, and I think I'm in pretty smart company to do so. Socrates once asked his students, "Do not all men desire happiness?" A student answered him, "There is no one who does not."

If Socrates was right, isn't it reasonable to assume that a decent nation will, at minimum, create the conditions in which its citizens can best pursue happiness? In the Declaration of Independence, the Founders didn't treat happiness as some fuzzy concept; they believed that people wanted happiness and had the right to pursue it. Along with life and liberty, happiness was the connection between the Creator and our nation's destiny, and the ability of its citizens to pursue and achieve happiness was a measure of the effectiveness and morality of the state.

According to hundreds of reliable surveys of thousands of people across the land, happy people increase our prosperity and strengthen our communities.

But today's leaders and policymakers seem to have forgotten this. To hear politicians talk about gross domestic product, health-care reform, and Social Security, you'd think that this nation's Founding Fathers held as self-evident that we are endowed by our Creator with the ability to purchase new, high-quality consumer durables each and every year, or to enjoy healthy economic growth with low inflation and full employment. The Founders didn't talk about these matters, not because they're unimportant, but because they believed happiness went deeper.

Pew Center research shows that liberal unhappiness, when comparing liberals to conservatives, has prevailed over a fairly long period.

Mick McNesby is a former tax advisor, consultant and negotiator. He was a frequent guest on political talk shows in Atlantic City, N.J., discussing the benefits of the lower cost of government.

Liberal Agenda To Editorials

Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda,Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda,Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda, Liberal Agenda